Sunday, April 19, 2015

Unit 11 Blog

Connections Discussion-

Why is the Coral Reef important- have wildlife and act as a protective barrier for coastal regions.

Direct negative impacts of increased carbon dioxide- Ocean acidification and "Increasing levels of carbon dioxide in the water cause additional damage to corals, leaving them defenseless against storm damage and erosion." Primary source is fossil fuel combustion near the coast

Economic impact and conservation efforts- Costs a lot maintain a clean coral reef and an unhealthy coral reef could reduce tourism. Coral monitoring is being done to reduce the harm to the coral reefs.

Walleye importance- Unofficial fish of Ohio.

Direct negative impacts of increased carbon dioxide- Carbon pollution is killing off the walleye and more frequent heat waves. Primary source is burning of fossil fuels.

Economic impact and conservation efforts- The walleye are fished by anglers for money and the pollution cuts down on recreation. The national wildlife federation is trying to cut down on hunting and fishing of the walleye.

Ozone discussion-
Tropospheric Ozone- formed from water, oxygen, VOCs and NOXs. It harms the respiratory functions of the lungs and is damaging to plant tissue.


Stratopheric Ozone blocks UVC and UVB radiation. It absorbs UVB radiation and is responsible for many skin problems.

Positive and Negative feedbacks-

Positive- More energy use+Co2 emissions- climate warms- use more air conditioning

Negative- Ice melts at the poles.  Freshwater released from the ice caps melting stops sinking of cold salty water at the poles.  Thermohaline circulation shuts down.  Poles no longer heated.  Ice forms on larger surface area.  Albedo increases, world cools.

Big Picture discussion- 

Economic Impact- The major industries cause a lot of the environmental impact mainly for economic gain. All the laws have somehow harmed certain industries vast profit with their rules. The melting of the ice also can harm tourism but help agriculture because there is more available land to cultivate. 

Environmental Impact- the depletion of the ozone can destroy many of the animals environments. It also affects the carbon cycle by bringing in extra CO2 that the cycle isn't accustomed to processing. 

Government legislation-
Montreal Protocol- international treaty designed to protect the ozone layer by phasing out the production of numerous substances that are responsible for ozone depletion.
Kyoto Protocol- set limits on emissions of greenhouse gases on developed countries but not developing countries. Not ratified by the USA
Clean air act- usa law to control air pollution on a national level

Human Impact- Humans cause a lot of impact on the earth and the only one that they don't necessarily contribute to is water vapor. 

Monday, April 6, 2015

Unit 10

Primary Source Ranking  
List #1:
  1. Hydroelectric; threat to river ecosystems, releases methane
  2. Geothermal; emits hazardous gases
  3. Natural Gas; methane, hydrocarbon, and hydrogen sulfide are released by it 
  4. Nuclear; Chernobyl 2.0 could happen, ie radioactive waste
  5. Solar; land use and habitat loss, water use, and the use of hazardous materials in manufacturing
  6. WInd; kill birds and bats and aesthetically displeasing
  7. Oil; oil spills can kill an entire aquatic system and emit hydrogen sulfide
  8. Biomass; carbon monoxide, nitrogen oxides, danger of indoor pollution.
  9. Coal; highest emitter of Co2 among energy sources

List #2:
  1.  Oil
  2. Natural Gas
  3. Coal
  4. Nuclear
  5. Biomass
  6. Hydroelectric
  7. Wind
  8. Geothermal
  9. Solar

List #3:.
  1. Oil
  2. Coal
  3. Natural Gas
  4. Biomass
  5. Nuclear
  6. Hydroelectric
  7. Wind
  8. Solar
  9. Geothermal

List #4: Assuming you mean EROI
  1. Wind
  2. Coal
  3. Hydroelectricity
  4. Natural gas
  5. Nuclear Energy
  6. Solar
  7. Geothermal
  8. Oil
  9. Biomass
Biofuels VS Fossil Fuels 

Availability
  • Biofuels include ethanol and biodiesel. Ethanol is an alcohol that is made from starches and sugars thus it can be found wherever plants grow.  Biodiesel is usually produced by taking oil from algae and plants thus it can also be found wherever plants grow making it more easily accessible than fossil fuels and it is a potentially renewable source as well.
  • Fossil Fuels are found deep underground such as oil and natural gas; coal has to be mined but in the end mostly all fossil fuels are spread out across earth but as stated above they are difficult to access and will not be available forever since they are unrenewable. 
Environmental impact
  • Biofuels- Emits CO2 and methane. Causes loss of agricultural land and a possible net increase in greenhouse emissions. 
  • Fossil fuels- fossil fuels release CO2 and hydrogen sulfide, they also release trace amounts of toxic metals that include mercury and it also contributes to acid rain. The dust from drilling is harmful and oil spills are horrid. 
Difference in their impact on the carbon cycle
  • Biofuels- since biofuels come from plants they already generate Co2 so the CO2 that it emits is the carbon that was taken in by them before so it is null
  • Fossil fuels overload the carbon cycle with extra carbon dioxide and thus hurts the carbon cycle since it is not ready for the new carbon. 

Nuclear Disasters
Environmental- Damaged the plant beyond use. More than 200,000 square km of europe were damaged and a lot of animals were damaged as well. Also basically destroyed the Red Pine forest and it damaged the water systems in the area in and around chernobyl
Economic- Destroyed the area around and inside Chernobyl and made the city of Chernobyl an impossible place to have a good economy since nobody could inhabit it. 
Human Health- At the time of the accident 31 people died and many more died later. There have also been an estimated amount of 4,000 cancer deaths caused by Chernobyl and has also been the cause of over 5,000 cases of thyroid cancer for humans under 18 years of age caused by the absorption of radioactive iodine.

ANWR

The Alaska National Wildlife Refuge is a tundra biome. It is easily damaged because since it is a tundra it has very few species and it has a very slow recovery rate. Furthermore, since it is a tundra it takes a while for the pollutants to flush and minor alterations can hugely alter the ecosystem. 

Environmental impacts- Oil spill could prove to be disastrous and the slow flushing of the pollutants would only further harm the ecosystem. There is also a reduction of breeding sites for caribou and the sleeping dens for polar bears. Drilling could also displace populations and move migrating routes. But drilling could also be good because it provides more oil for us humans. 

Economic- Oil spills are massively expensive to recover and repair from. Drilling for oil is also expensive, especially setting up the oil rig and such, but the payback from successfully getting oil is huge, economically speaking, as Kevin and Mitchell pointed out in their Pecha Kucha. 

Reducing Consumption

We can reduce the overall consumption of oil by using more biofuels to more cleanly transport ourselves and we can also start using the suns energy more efficiently. The sun is always there to be used but we never use it to its maximum efficiency. There could even be solar powered cars that run on both sun and ethanol on rainy days.

BIG Picture Discussion

Economic impact- The impact of energy on our economy is huge. We rely on energy, but at what price is too high? We pay for light bills, water bill, AC bills, etc. These are all forms of energy that come from the sources that we have been taught of in this unit. The wars in the Middle East are mainly caused by oil and that is a huge price that the USA has payed by having to finance wars and other deals that involve extracting oil from the ME. Transportation also affects the economy because subconsciously people travel more frequently when gas is less. 

Environmental impact- The impact that fossil fuels and renewable resources has had on the environment is extremely massive and even that is an understatement. All the way from the extraction of the energy source, such as oil, peat, coal, etc, can harm the environment and cause a huge problem for many ecosystems and then at the end of the specter we have the actual use of the fossil fuel or source which contributes, most of the time, to the greenhouse gases that harm the ozone layer and kill of ecosystems. The use of dams harms whole schools of fish and the oil spills in the Gulf have destroyed generations of certain species. 

Human Impact- Our greed and inefficiency as humans in the past is the reason for why we have to now search for cleaner and renewable sources of energy that are sustainable. But humans also impact energy by being able to harness it, which if we actually think about it it's a tremendous feat from the human race. We have used a simple fossil fuel to power our homes, our cars, our lives!

Government legislation- 
Rural Electrification Act (1935)- provided loans to set up a network of power lines to serve rural communities with energy so that rural communities could finally have energy. 
Nuclear Waste Policy Act (1982)- provided for a system for nuclear waste disposal for high level radioactive waste and set up people to research the nuclear waste and its effects. Helped create Yucca Mountain.
Emergency Petroleum Allocation Act (1973)- Required president to allocate and control the prices of oil/petroleum after the massive petroleum shortages of 1973
Energy Policy Act (2005)- provided laws and mandates to use cleaner energy and be more efficient with the use of energy overall in the USA. 

Sunday, March 15, 2015

Unit 9- Waste Management

Landfill Discussion
Now that we have seen a landfill in person (you did if you went on the field trip), discuss at least 3 types of materials that should not be placed in a landfill and explain the potential environmental and public health consequences of disposing of such things in a landfill.  Outline two methods for reducing the amount of these substances that enter MSW input.

A hazardous material is toxic and/or corrodes metal, is flammable, or volatile. Methane is also extremely dangerous it happens to be released in a landfill because it decomposes into energy and if that energy isn't used then it can explode

Batteries- Batteries sometimes have lead, cadmium, or mercury which can make it highly toxic. Sometimes car batteries can combust because the batteries produce hydrogen and if it becomes overcharged it can explode. Batteries can also leak and are considered e-waste. 

Varnishes- These liquids are highly flammable because of the resin and drying oils. As the varnish cures the wood it gives off heat as well. Even rags with varnish can combust if they are not allowed to give off heat. Like a huge pile of rags stacked together. 

Fluorescent bulbs- Bulbs contain mercury that can be extremely hazardous if it is leaked. 

How to reduce the amount that enters the MSW- Recycle correctly and don't throw these away in a container that leads to a landfill. Also instead of buying the cheap batteries or lightbulbs' buy the more pricey once that last longer. That way there is less waste that goes to the landfill if it does end up going there. 

Recycling Discussion
Three common examples of items that can be recycled are paper, aluminum, and plastics.  Discuss at least one environmental and economic benefit and cost of recycling each of these items.  If your city only had the funding to set up a recycling center for one of these materials, which would you choose and why?  Finally, how would you persuade the members of your community that recycling is ultimately good for the community?

Paper
  • Environmental
    • Benefit- Can be used as compost. 
    • Cost- Recycling paper requires toxic chemicals that can be harmful for the environment
  • Economic
    • Benefit- Creates jobs for people to pick up the recycling in neighborhood and cities. 
    • Cost- It actually is cheaper to throw away trash into a landfill then burning it than to recycle.
Plastic
  • Environmental
    • Benefit- Don't fill up landfills because they get recycled. 
    • Cost- Water bottles contain chemicals that can lead to health problems and recycling only increases the risk. 
  • Economic
    • Benefit- Can give bottles a second life by reusing them. 
    • Cost- It is expensive to continually buy water bottles. 
Aluminum
Aluminum. I would choose aluminum because it is a closed loop process. That means that no new materials are introduced throughout the recycling process and it is infinitely recyclable, unlike paper or plastic. The energy required to recycle aluminum is also less than to mine and create new aluminum. 

I would persuade the members of my society to recycle by proving to them that it creates jobs, is good for the environment because many things that are recycled come from non renewable resources. 

Superfund/Brownfields Discussion
We watched a news clip about the industrial waste buried under the Love Canal near Niagara Falls.  This area was a Superfund site but has been deemed safe enough for people to now live there and has since been redeveloped.  Explain the difference between a Superfund site and a Brownfield and give another example of each in the US.  There are two primary ways for turning these sites back into usable land by either removing the contaminated soil or by planting vegetation that would decontaminate the soil.  Explain two potential problems with each of these methods of reclamation. Reclaiming these sites is a debatable hot topic these days.  Explain one societal and one environmental for reclaiming and using the land.

Brownfield- contaminated areas that may require cleanup before being used to develop businesses or homes or to expand another area. An example is Homestead, Pennsylvania where the Carnegie steel factory was located and it is now a commercial center. 
A superfund site is a site that the USA government funds the cleaning of the site under CERCLA regulations. The Madison County mines were a superfund site. 

Clearing out soil- It is massively expensive to clear out the soil and put new soil in. It can also expose workers to airborne contaminants. 

Planting vegetation- The newly introduced vegetation may harm the insects and bugs that feed on the plants. Whenever the vegetation is removed the land is still hazardous. 

The question does not clearly specify if I should state a benefit or problem with reclaiming and using the land so I wll do both. 
Societal- It makes the surrounding area look better, but it can also go awry and cause problems if it is not done 100% correctly and can lead to deaths and problems, similar to the Love Canal except the LC was not even reclaimed properly and lead to CERCLA.

Environmental- Reduce hazardous runoffs into streams is good, but it can also be bad for the animals that feed off the vegetation in the area. 

BIG PICTURE DISCUSSION

Environmental Impact- Waste management has a huge impact on the environment. We saw in the video that Lovefield was deemed to be a national disaster because of the impact it had on the land and the people who moved into the houses on the land. Landfills can contaminate the environment with their trash releasing methane and other gases that be volatile or highly toxic. Furthermore, recycling impacts the environment in both negative and positive ways. When the recycling process occurs it can be done in an unhygienic and unsafe manner. It can lead to widespread pollution, but on the bright side it is good to recycle plastic, paper, aluminum, etc. because that way money and energy don't have to be spent to make new paper, plastic, aluminum, etc. 

Human Impact- Waste management is also impacted by humans and it impacts humans as well. Humans are the reason for why the landfills exist, for why global warming occurs, for why pollution is so widespread, for why the earth is so damaged. And in the end it will end up costing us our home(earth) and our lives. E-waste is a huge impact that humans have placed upon the world. It is highly toxic and hard to get rid off. Sometimes it is sent into outerspace, but that simply corrodes the Galaxy as well. Incineration can lead to pollution as well. Disposing of trash is a lose-lose situation for the environment. Good things about waste management though is that it creates thousands of jobs for humans. 

Economic Impact- Waste management creates a plethora of jobs that range from minimum wage to extremely well paying. But stopping the harm we inflict upon the environment with our waste is costly. The reclaiming of Brownfield's is ludicrously exorbitant and sometimes stops the harm but harms the animals that eat the vegetation. The clearing of soil is perhaps even more expensive financially speaking. In the water treatment facility we learned just how much energy is required to keep the facility running and that energy costs money to the people and to the city. When curing diseases such as malaria, HIV, H1N1 and mad cow disease it cost money to develop cures and to educate the people on the dangers of the diseases. 

Government Legislation- 
RCRA- The resource conservation and recovery act was designed to regulate and eliminate hazardous waste. It ensures that hazardous waste is disposed of properly from the moment it becomes waste until it reaches its end in the cycle. 
CERCLA- the Comprehensive environmental response compensation and liability act is also known as the superfund. It taxes chemical and oil industries and makes sure that brownfields are disposed of properly. It is enforced by the federal government as is the RCRA. 
The Stockholm convention came together to ban 12 chemicals or to reduce their use. These 12 chemicals include PCBs and DDTs

Sunday, March 1, 2015

Unit 8 Blog

Freshwater Resource Discussion

Aquifers-
  • Ecological benefits
    • 1) Provides water in wells for animals 
    • 2) It is stored underground and is a good source of water to irrigate crops
  • Economic benefits
    • 1)Does not have to be desalinated unless there is a saltwater intrusion
    • 2) Aquifers are a reliable way to get water
  • Human impact-  Humans use aquifers to irrigate crops and if the pumping of water from the aquifer is more than the amount of water in the recharge then a cone of depression can form and dry up nearby wells.
Lakes
  • Ecological benefits
    • 1)Fertile Soil is common around 
    • 2) Regulate the water flow of a river
  • Economic benefits
    • 1) Lakes attract activities like boating, fishing, and other activities that contribute to the economy
    • 2) Artificial lakes are used for hydro-electric power generation
  • Human impact- The use of fertilizers can cause eutrophication in Lakes and affect the level of productivity in the lake.
Rivers
  • Ecological benefits
    • 1) Home for many animals like fishes and turtles
    • 2) The rivers fertilize soil in the area
  • Economic benefits
    • 1) Transport. Like in boats or ships if it is huge river
    • 2) Usually people and communities settle near rivers thus making them dependant of the river and creating a lot of activities around the river that create jobs and help the economy. 
  • Human impact- Overusing rivers or living near rivers can contaminate or drain them. The thames river in London, England was once a beautiful river, but when the industrial revolution came about it got nasty with pollution. 
Wetlands
  • Ecological benefits
    • 1)Natural filter of water
    • 2) Regulate water distribution
  • Economic benefits
    • 1) Wetlands reduce the impacts of hurricanes thus making said natural disasters less costly
    • 2) Benefit the growth of rice and helps the rice industry
  • Human impact- Humans drain wetlands and harm the wetland ecosystem in doing so. 
Water Diversion Discussion

Hoover Dam
  • Location- The Hoover Dam is located in the Black Canyon of the Colorado River and impounds Lake Mead to make electricity 
  • Ecological
    • Benefits
      • The Hoover Dam controls floods and can even prevent them. 
    • Costs
      • The construction of the Dam hurt the ecosystem that took place in the Colorado River. The change of watershed, the erosion of river banks, and the pollution of increased vehicles have hurt said ecosystem. 
  • Economic
    • Benefits
      • Produces electricity
    • Costs
      • It put the Hoover administration into debt because the cost of the dam was extremely expensive.
Pont du Gard
  • Location- The Pont du Gard crosses the Gardon River in Remoulins, in southern France. The PdG carries water from Uzes and diverts it to Nimes. 
  • Ecological
    • Benefits
      • Got water to the people of Rome and maintained the Roman Empire and helped it expand. Got fresh and clean water from streams and springs all the way to Rome!
    • Costs
      • The fall of the Roman empire was caused partly because of the great aqueducts. Enemies would poison the water which would not only harm the animals, but it would also kill the Romans leading to their fall.
  • Economic
    • Benefits
      • In its time of use the PdG would transport water to the citizens of Nimes making water cheaper. It is now used for tourist purposes in Rome.
    • Costs
      • The Pont du Gard was costly to build and even more to maintain and in the 10th century the aqueduct became clogged with mineral deposits. The aqueduct also took 15 years to be finished.
Three Gorges Dam
  • Location- The Three Gorges Dam is located in the Yangtze River in China. 
  • Ecological
    • Benefits
      • The TGD has many purposes and one of them is flood control. 
    • Costs
      • The fish have been heavily affected by the dam. They can't cross the river anymore because of the dam and their habitats and lifestyle have and will continue to be affected
  • Economic
    • Benefits
      • The TGD produces electricity for the area around it and it produces energy for nine provinces and two cities. 
    • Costs
      • Erosions in the reservoir have increased the number of landslides in the area. This is costly for the government. 
Water Quality Discussion

Nitrate- In Parr Park we tested the water for nitrate. Nitrate in water can be bad for the consumers health if there is too much of it in the water. At small amounts nitrate isn't bad, but if the water has too much nitrate then that water is unsafe to drink. Nitrate can get into the water in several ways. It can come from fertilizer runoff, leaking from septic tanks, sewage, and erosion of natural deposits. 

Phosphate- Phosphate is not bad for the water but in excess it can lead to algal blooms and thus intoxicate the water. The test for phosphate is to see if the water is still safe for the wildlife or from whoever uses it. Phosphate is naturally in streams but can also come from sewage or fertilizer. 

Temperature- The temperature of the water determines what type of animals can live in it. The temperature of the water is also an indicator of the oxygen levels. If it is warm then it can hold less oxygen. 

Fecal Coliform- Fecal Coliform is a test run to see if the water is intoxicated with fecal matter. If it is then that water is unsafe to drink and can be even hazardous to consume. FC in water can also lead to an increase in oxygen demand for the water. FC comes from human and animal digestive systems. 

Ph- Acidity or baseness of the water. HIgh acidity is horrible for wildlife. The Ph levels normally range from 6.5-8.5.

Biological Indicator Species- Stoneflies. If there are a lot of stoneflies in the area then that tells scientists that the water is high in its oxygen levels. If the temperature is cold then the oxygen levels are high and can lead to an increase in stoneflies.

Water Conservation Discussion

Agriculture
  • 1)Use drought tolerant crops and seeds so that you don't need to water them whenever there are droughts
  • 2)Harvest rainwater and use that instead of regular irrigation techniques. 
Industry 
  • 1)Water-less fracking. A lot of times companies frack for oil and to do that they need water. Water-less fracking technology, albeit expensive, can help preserve water. 
  • 2)Don't use nuclear reactors. Nuclear reactors use up a lot of water and water vapor that wastes a lot of water.
Household
  • 1)Use low flush toilets to help preserve water instead of wasting clean water on flushing a dump. 
  • 2)Be more efficient in the use of sprinklers and gardening techniques in order to cut down on water waste. 
BIG FOUR

Human Impact- Humans contribute a lot to the water world and pollution. In the assignments I did alongside my group I learned that the construction of dams, aqueducts, dikes, etc are all ways that human beings have diverted water for their benefit. The Romans did it in the olden days with aqueducts and now we have huge dams that everybody cares about. I do give a dam(hahaha just a joke Mrs. Kays). Sadly we also impact the environment in a negative manner. Humans have polluted the water and overused it and when we do use it we use it incorrectly. There are more efficient ways to flush to the toilet or to frack for oil. In the Salton Sea project I learned that the use of water from the sea to irrigate can dry out the sea and hurt the whole ecosystem around, irrigation that is cause by humans. 

Environmental Impact- The environment is greatly impacted as well in this. Water is one of the most important parts of the environment. It is essential for farming and for animal life and the pollution of water can really harm the environment. Dams control floods and help the environment but they also prevent water from crossing to another side and harm the wildlife there or prevent fish from getting to their breeding grounds. 

Economic Impact- Hydropower provided by dams helps the economy by providing cheaper energy. Aqueducts in the olden days made clean water cheaper and easier to acquire. Energy is cheaper, but the water can also get polluted in industry when trying to make items more economically viable. In agriculture the government subsidizes the farmers to help them grow crops and even put themselves into debt with the hoover dam. Oil spills are massively harmful and very expensive to fix and recover from. 

Government Legislation- Humans are destroying mother earth. That is a fact. Luckily there are laws to help keep her destruction to minimum. There is the clean water act of 1972 that supports the protection and propagation of fish, wildlife and shellfish and recreation in and on the the water. It is enforced by the EPA. The safe drinking water act of 74, 86, and 96 set standards for what safe water for drinking should be in the USA. These laws have been put into place to not only help prevent mother earths inevitable destruction but to help human beings health as well. 



Tuesday, February 3, 2015

Unit 7-Land Management


Forestry Discussion-

Benefit of forest fire- The main benefit of using prescribed burning as a technique to help the ecosystem is that the fire itself liberates nutrients tied up in dead biomass and also allows for new species to develop there that were not there before. 


Cost of prescribed burning or a negative- A prescribed burn can easily get out of control and become a real danger and it also contributes to an increase in carbon dioxide because of the vast amount of burning that occurs.

  • Economic impact- Can be very costly if not done correctly. 
  • Ecological impact- Increase in CO2, messes up soil, alters plant community structure
  • Human impact- If a prescribed fire gets out of control then people can die
Global Nutrition Discussion-

The production of meat is more costly at a global level because of the use of fossil fuels and other energy. As it says in the powerpoint, back then during hunting/gathering the energy input was not that great since it was mainly human input. Human input is not as costly as fossil fuels which can never be used again. The energy subsidy of feedlot beef is above 10, but the energy subsidy of large-scale corn is 0.5! Meat production also requires more land as well. According to Peta.com, raising animals for food now uses up an astounding 30% of the Earth's land mass. Peta also says that
"It takes more than 11 times as much fossil fuel to make one calorie from animal protein as it does to make one calorie from plant protein"
In terms of resources needed the production of meat is also largely inefficient. Yet again PETA pulling out the facts by saying 
It takes up to 13 pounds of grain to produce just 1 pound of meat, and even fish on fish farms must be fed up to 5 pounds of wild-caught fish to produce 1 pound of farmed fish flesh
and that
more than 70 percent of the grain and cereals that we grow in this country are fed to farmed animals. 
It is also more costly water-wise. It takes up more water to clean out the filth, to feed the load of animals, and to transport them than to simply grow crops.
It takes more than 2,400 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of meat.
The overall environmental impact of meat production is disgustingly huge. It puts a strain on the supply of clean water available, it cuts down on the amount of fossil fuels left, and takes up a lot of arable land. It also causes a lot pollution "According to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the runoff from factory farms pollutes our waterways more than all other industrial sources combined."
Genetic Engineering Discussion-

GMOs or genetically modified organisms are a ruse. A tomato is not really as big as the ones you buy are, actually the one that you buy is a modified tomato and since it is modified it is now redder and bigger and juicier and maybe even healthier. 

Some benefits of GMOs are

  1. Greater amount of that organism that are produced
  2. Quality is greater
  3. Reduction in pesticide use
  4. Reduction in world hunger
  5. Bigger profits
Some costs of GMOs are
  1. Safety of humans
  2. Effect on biodiversi
  3. Regulation or lack thereof 
GMOs increase profit of the companies and help produce more in less time. GMOs also have a lesser need for pesticides and greater resistance to pests. This impacts the economy in a healthy manner by increasing profits and it also help the environment by not having to use pesticides. I don't see a downside to the increase in profits because there really is none. The downside to the resistance in pests is that the pesticide companies are now not needed so that is a downside for them. The environmental impact of a resistance to insects is good in that now the pests don't have to die. There is no downside to having a greater yield or reduction in world hunger. Those both impact the economy by mass producing the products and improving the economy. 
Non GM crops are more expensive to buy and to produce, they use pesticides, and they expire a lot faster than regular crops. 
Sustainable Agriculture Discussion-

No till agriculture- This method of farming helps prevent and even stop soil degradation by leaving crop residues there and not tilling the land after harvest. By not tilling the land the soil is less ably disturbed by outside forces that cause erosion. It is also more more efficient with human labor and even economically. Since one does not have to till the land it does not use up fuel that the machines used consume or energy of other fossil fuels thus an increase in profits, albeit minimal sometimes. 

Contour plowing- Harvesting and plowing parallel to the land to prevent erosion. By plowing and harvesting along the contour lines soil erosion is prevented because, in most cases, it disrupts the heavy water run off that erodes the land and degrades the soil. It also helps by preserving the topsoil. Furthermore there is a decreased need for the use of fertilizer and artificial irrigation making it economically efficient as well

Pest Management Discussion-

Integrated Pest Management- Using various farming techniques to mitigate and cut down on the use of pesticides.

Crop rotation- In this method the farmer rotates the crop every season to help his land and to reduce the amount of pests. In rotating the crops you give the crops better soil and nutrient to help it better shield itself of pests. If a farmer continues to use the same spot of land then he can exhaust that land and make it easier for pests to attack it. It gives time for the nutrients to grow back into the soil.

Intercropping- In this method two or more crop species are planted in the same field at the same time.
 "Intercropping works by attracting pests away from their host plant. Planting a variety of plant species on a field increases the distance between plants of the same species, making it harder for pests to target their main crop."

Both methods are more cost effective. Using pesticides is expensive and these two methods don't require pesticide use.